# Work Proposal: Support for community content on farmos.org

**URL:** <https://farmos.discourse.group/t/work-proposal-support-for-community-content-on-farmos-org/1265>\
**Category:** Jobs Board\
**Created:** [June 10, 2022, 7:33pm UTC](https://farmos.discourse.group/t/work-proposal-support-for-community-content-on-farmos-org/1265 "2022-06-10T19:33:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![walt](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/farmos.discourse.group/walt/32/13_2.png) [@walt](https://farmos.discourse.group/u/walt)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2022, 12:11pm UTC](https://farmos.discourse.group/t/work-proposal-support-for-community-content-on-farmos-org/1265/4 "2022-06-13T12:11:54Z")

</div>

> [@jgaehring](#):
>
> Oh nice! I think I’ve heard variations of this but not sure I’ve seen it laid out so well before.

Am happy to hear @jgaehring that you also find the GUT to be a useful framework. For my part, tho working w/in those guardrails is still a challenge, it’s the kind of challenge that makes communication more effective, so… Well worth the effort!

> [@jgaehring](#):
>
> In a technical sense, we could fairly easily create a `category` property in Front matter, we would just need to decide how to present those separate categories in the navigation and other UI elements.

Yes! With \>1 way to skin this cat, the important thing is that there be 4 mutually exclusive categories, and (i _think_, based on my own read of the GUT), that each doc artefact (independent of medium; video, text, Discourse post, etc… That’s another dimension of classification) should belong to n=1 of these categories. Tho this may seem an overly/ needlessly restrictive constraint, i have found (maybe you too, since [our earlier collaboration on a related project](https://farmos.discourse.group/t/blogging-on-farmos-org/253) suffered from lack of clarity about this distinction, as i recall it), it really helps to be perfectly clear about which of these doc-types you are working to produce.

Anyway: this issue of community contributions to [farmos.org](http://farmos.org) is important enough, IMHO, i’m happy to support the cause as best i can, JG. Rock on, mate!

---

_[View the full topic](https://farmos.discourse.group/t/work-proposal-support-for-community-content-on-farmos-org/1265)._
